A New York socialist candidate’s past post bragging about wiping dirty hands on the American flag now meets silence from a local leader, raising alarm over respect for the nation itself.

Story Highlights

• Archived posts show praise for communism and ridicule of the U.S. flag.
• The candidate said she “deeply regrets” earlier tweets but left specifics unaddressed.
• Reports cite calls to abolish police, prisons, and borders in prior posts.
• Media coverage confirms a 2022 jab at U.S. service members over “war crimes”.

What The Record Shows About The Posts

Yahoo News reported that Darializa Avila Chevalier’s deleted account praised communism and Soviet figures, and included a post about wiping dirty hands on the American flag instead of a napkin. The report also cited calls to abolish police, prisons, and borders, plus repeated Marxist references. These are not single slips. They track across years and themes. That pattern matters for voters who want leaders who respect America, its institutions, and the people who serve it.

CNN and other outlets reviewed the same deleted account, which included calls to abolish core law-and-order institutions. Those ideas would weaken public safety and border control. Families in New York already feel the strain from crime and illegal immigration. They want stability and accountability, not utopian slogans that treat policing and borders as evil. When a candidate’s own record shows contempt for those tools, voters deserve full answers, not a shrug.

How The Candidate Responded — And What She Did Not

During a local debate, Avila Chevalier said she “deeply regrets” posts from 2018 to 2022 and framed that as accountability. In a Vox interview, she added she would not use that language today. Regret can be a start. But those statements did not address the flag post or the most extreme abolition claims in detail. They also did not explain the 2022 swipe at U.S. service members over “war crimes,” which drew new attention and concern among military families.

The lack of direct answers leaves open core questions. Did she post the flag remark as reported? Does she still support abolishing police, prisons, and borders? Voters can accept growth. They cannot accept fog. Clear, specific corrections build trust. General apologies without specifics do not. When candidates dodge the hardest items, citizens must weigh the risk to public safety, national security, and basic respect for country.

Why Endorsements And Silence Matter Now

Coverage shows she held support from powerful city figures and Democratic Socialists of America circles even after the deleted posts surfaced. Endorsements amid these facts signal a disturbing standard. If party leaders ignore contempt for the flag, the military, and the rule of law, the message to voters is simple: ideology first, America second. That is the same mindset that drove border chaos, anti-police campaigns, and rising disorder that hurt working families the most.

🚨 Darializa Avila Chevalier, co-founder of CUAD and now the Democrat nominee for NY-13, is tied to a group whose own words call for “undermining and eradicating America” and bringing “unrest and violence in America.”

This is not someone who can honestly swear the oath to… pic.twitter.com/dzkf18S6N3

— Gina Beana Fofina (@Ginasassyass) June 29, 2026

The pattern fits a known playbook: delete posts, blame youth, and pivot to softer words. But this case is not about tone. It is about ideas that would gut public order and mock the nation’s symbols. Conservatives should insist on bright lines. Honor the flag. Support lawful borders. Back police and safe streets. Respect our troops. If a candidate once scorned these and now seeks power, she must clearly renounce those views, not only the “language,” and explain when and why she changed.

What Voters Should Watch Next

Voters should demand a point-by-point accounting of each flagged post, including the American flag remark, the abolition claims, and the attack on service members. Journalists should press for dates, context, and whether those views are now rejected in full. If the campaign cannot provide that clarity, then the record stands on its own. Elections are about judgment and trust. A clear, public, specific correction builds both. Anything less invites more division and weaker communities.

Sources:

twitchy.com, facebook.com, yahoo.com, en.wikipedia.org, nytimes.com